First the referenced site:
http://www.hhptf.org/
And, quoted from above referenced site 05.19.08 EST:
One view of the One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) program and its changing fortunes:
There has been far more outrage online over the news that the OLPC may switch to Windows from its version of the free Linux operating system than over the discovery that hardly any of the laptops, originally to be deployed in no quantities smaller than 1m a country, will ever reach the poorest children.
The collapse of the scheme illuminates the utter falsity of the hope that technology alone can lift people out of poverty. Knowledge may, but the technology that spreads knowledge best is literacy, not laptops.
Firstly, excellent online resource for librarians, and others interested in the materials presented. Secondly, the title of these postings – “Hunger, Homelessness & Porverty Task Force” from an ALA Round Table Discussion, gives me a moment to reflect on exactly what is being presented in this post. One distinction to keep in mind is that the OPLC is not a catalog system…it is a program called One Laptop Per Child.
Having noted that…a personal observation. Yesterday I found an excellent resource for teaching English that was straight-forward, to the point, and presented well. As an example of excellence, the TESOL program identified all of the key issues – for their program.
I thought to myself – wow, they have it going on. Sortof. But, it is “scoped”, organized, and a better practice than many on a “global” level. The groundfloor of my research has opened up and I think of these things, as I type. And, I’m left with one thought – we can’t eat laptops; conversely, it is unseemly to eat the TESOL worker…lol.
Now, I think I’ll make a pot of a strong brew and continue with my experiential project…It’s got the makings of a very inexpensive way to introduce a, well, you have to join the group to know that…God Bless America.
One more time, as I raise my hand in my mind – yes, Literacy before laptops makes sense, but we have ways in ProLiteracy methods that can maximize this potential – fuck the agenda, and get back to basics – we’ve got technology on all levels – that’s the issue. How do we share this…by sharing information with experts and coming to agreements that are not based on big money agendas, but appreciating all the money that does flow into the efforts.
Every volunteer will tell you – they love their job (most of the time…giggles)…and, the “tags” are teasers!
Life, Music, Politics – ACTION! Take One…Is it spam?
June 23, 2008
Okay, I’m not quite sure what I’m doing but I just love SellaBand.com…Lots of changes, yes. Lots of music getting into the airwaves – for sure. Yes, if you click on the link below, I read that there is a remote possibility that I, Shirley J Rhodes, may receive, ummm, money? What a concept!
Now, for my spam – take one, click:
http://club.sellaband.com/clickin.html?ref=22284-1-2
(And, let’s see where this takes us…smiles)
Here’s my very first example – not related to the above, ummm, spam:
<object width=”291″ height=”400″>
<param name=”allowScriptAccess” value=”sameDomain” />
<param name=”movie” value=”shop.swf” />
<param name=”quality” value=”high” />
<param name=”FlashVars” value=”believer=freetobeme_pride” />
<embed flashvars=”believer=freetobeme_pride” src=”http://www.sellaband.com/static/tools/shop/shop.swf” quality=”high” width=”291″ height=”400″ />
</object>
For educational purposes – I believe this is an excellent Tertiary* Source for Digital Libraries, with a twist!
Related reference, sortof – but, explains the link to the resource and why it would make an interesting case study in digital libraries, i.e. the way that the marketing structure is setup, at this moment:
American Psychological Association (APA):